Showing posts with label Ask Dave. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ask Dave. Show all posts

November 26, 2011

Ask Dave, November 26

Ask Dave, November 26th
I get tons of questions each week, I respond as quickly as possible, and I might just answer them here too. If you have questions you can email me at <a href="mailto:Learn@DaveShumway.com">Learn@DaveShumway.com</a>.

Question:
Tony asked...
Why do you use an exposure bias?

Answer:
Often when working in rapidly changing light, with dynamic subjects, I (and many professional photographers) switch from manual to aperture priority mode (some will go to shutter priority mode, depending on the situation). When working with most modern cameras the photographer needs to be aware of what the camera is thinking when metering and suggesting an exposure for a scene, so they can step in and override the camera as needed.

On a basic level your camera wants everything that it meters to be 18% grey (see note). For most "normal" scenes that works well, but nature is full of black (100%) and white (0%). Think about a black bear or a tundra swan. A head shot of a black bear will tend to be overexposed as the camera thinks the black bear should be 18% grey. A similarly tight shot of a swan will be under exposed as the camera attempts to make the white swan 18% grey.

Some overcome this issue by using a middle/neutral grey exposure card (or something that is about 18% grey) with the camera's spot meter to dial/lock in a correct exposure for the scene. Others use high end light meters to know what the "true" setting should be, but neither of these methods work well in rapidly changing conditions with wild subjects. However I have and still use both of these methods in the studio.

Regardless of the shooting mode you should understand what your camera is trying to do, so you can override as needed, to get the correct exposure for the light at the moment your camera goes "click." This normally means taking countless photographs with your gear in many conditions, so that when the moment of truth comes you can set your camera correctly, with little to no thought.

Who cares, I shoot RAW?
That is a legitimate argument, but I strive to get my image as close to "perfect" at the moment of capture. Also adjusting exposure is a good way to increase the visibility of nose, and there are the situations where you miss by more than a stop (about what can be easily adjusted with a RAW file). There are also the times when over exposing a black bear could completely blows out the grass or snow in the background, or when shooting a landscape that missing the desired exposure dilutes the power of the color and most software has a difficult time recovering those lost elements.

NOTE:
If I recall, it was Ansel Adams that suggested 18% as middle/neutral grey and many followed suit. Ansel was speaking of reflected light not luminance, which happens to be what ANSI's standards are based on, they use a luminance of 12%. Oddly Sekonic uses a reflectance of 14% (they are the top handheld light meter manufacture). The difference between 12% and 18% grey is about 1/2 stop, but a luminance of 12% is typically going to measure a reflectance of 18%. I know it all seems a bit crazy, convoluted and pointless. If, like most, you use your camera in an evaluative metering mode that means the camera wants most of your scene to show a reflective light of around 18% grey (the last sentence is all that matters). 


A few general exposure compensation tips to remember:

  • Brightly lit snow is one and one-third to two stops brighter than medium/neutral gray;
  • a bear or bison filling the frame is normally around one stop darker than medium/neutral gray;
  • a white swan or pelican is normally around one stop brighter then medium/neutral gray;
  • a raptor's dark underside against bright sky is normally around two to three stops too dark (your camera gets confused by the bright sky);
  • dead grass of early spring and fall is very near white (0%) expose accordingly;
  • When in doubt, check the histogram. Still in doubt, bracket. (heck always check the histogram)
Happy shooting 

November 24, 2011

Ask Dave, November 24

Ask Dave, November 24th
I get tons of questions each week, I respond as quickly as possible, and I might just answer them here too. If you have questions you can email me at <a href="mailto:Learn@DaveShumway.com">Learn@DaveShumway.com</a>.

Question:
A student asked...
Why don't you use any of the Really Right Stuff products? I thought they were really popular, do you think they are overhyped junk?

Answer:
I have nothing against Really Right Stuff, I actually do use their "L" plate for my 5D II and a replacement foot for the 400/600.

If I was at a point where I needed more tripods/heads/supports I would consider their products. I have two nice carbon tripods (for photography), two heavy duty aluminum tripods (for video), four nice ballheads, three gimbal heads, and plenty of other gadgets.

My second answer was that I would happily use RRS products if they would give them to me, but I am not about to toss thousands of dollars in the very nice gear I have now.

The student then asked what I would use of theirs if it was given to me.
  • TVC-33L with a TA-3-LB and PG-02 FG Pano-Gimbal Head 
    • I would use this combination for my normal shooting in and around Montana/Wyoming and basically anywhere that I would be able to drive to. The added bonus of a high quality pano head would be great when I turn my focus to landscapes. 
  • I would add a BH-55 LR: Full-sized ballhead with LR to put on the 33L when traveling to remote locations. RRS needs to make something like the wimberly sidekick for travel where a ball head and gimbal head are both needed (this could be worked in to also act as a pano assist tool). 
    • Anyone that has ever taken a charter flight to remote locations know that every pound costs money and space is always at a premium. Your survival and comfort come from the gear you bring along and you need to be sure that each item you bring can serve multiple jobs (two tripods is often out of the question). 
    • I do love the aspherical ball in my Arca-Swiss Z1sp.  As the lenses angle is changed the power of gravity changes. To compensate more tension is required, but because of the aspherical ball, the Z1 automatically adjusts for off-center loads. I know of no other ball head that does this. 
  • TVC-24L Tripod with BH-40 LR Ball head 
    • A small/light tripod that is still strong enough to support a long lens in a pinch is a very important piece of gear for any photographer. When you are hiking/skiing/climbing in 10 or more miles before sunrise you need small/light gear, but at the same time if it is not strong and dependable it is worthless. 
  • MC-34 Carbon Fiber Monopod
    • I would place a QR clamp on the monopod rather than a Monopod head, as I really only use a monopod for shooting sports. I would consider using a PCL-1 rather than a QR clamp for the times I am shooting ski racing where the monopod might be buried in snow, but I still need to pan with a quick moving subject. 
  • A PCL-1 & PCL-DVTL and a 192 Precision Plus Package
    • The PCL-1 allows you to level the scene with your ball head then shoot your panorama. Often folks find that they level their tripod legs to level the ball head base, but then fail to really level the camera for a wide panoramic scene. 
    • The PCL-DVTL is just the fast way to attach the PCL-1 to your ball head. 
    • The 192 Precision Plus Package is a versatile nodal rail for all lenses weather foot or camera supported. I currently use a custom solution in place of this, that also happens to be my long lens support. 
  • B91-QR
    • For birders a flash braket is an important thing to have, and I actually really like the RRS design for putting the flash above the center of the lens (allowing easy operation on a gimbal head. 
  • Toss in feet and "L" brakets for cameras and lenses
    • RRS really does make the best feet and "L" plates. I do think that they could modify some plates to fit more cleanly on common lenses, like the 70-200s, that have feet that cannot be replaced. 
  • And if they would make a few design changes I would even consider the CB-YS-QR-Package
    • RRS's long lens support is a bit on the heavy side, and it  also could be modified to serve multiple jobs in the field. *RSS - if you want to chat about this you know how to reach me*
The gear I have and use now is excellent, so I have no plans of switching, but RRS has a long list of great products, that I often encourage students and clients to consider when making their support purchases. 

What do I use?
It is all listed on my gear page, but here are some of the highlights:
  • Gitzo GT3540XLS (amazing tripod)
  • Induro GHB2 (gimbal head, lives on the GT3540XLS)
  • Custom made long lens support (used with the GHB2)
  • Arca-Swiss Z1sp (ball head used on the 3540XLS when traveling to remote locations)
  • Wimberly Sidekick (used with the Arca-Swiss when traveling to remote locations)
  • Induro CT214
  • Actratech GP (ball head, lives on the CT214)
  • RRS L-braket for Canon 5DII
  • Induro CM34 (monopod for shooting sports with QR clamp)
  • Induro A413
  • Induro BHD2 ball head (lives on an  A413, for time lapses)
  • Induro A413
  • Manfroto 501HDV video fluid head (lives on an A413)
  • Dynamic Perception 6' time lapse dolly
  • Induro BHD1 ball head (lives on the time lapse dolly)

September 4, 2011

Ask Dave, September 4th

First off... Sorry that I took the month of August off, without warning. I was charged with launching the new website for Rocky Mountain College, and they had lots of issues thanks to a consultant and designers that did not understand the needs of the college. It all worked out okay, but I did end up spending a few weeks working 100+ hours each week. When you work 108 hours and there are only 168 hours in a week, well... you can do the math, but sleeping about 42 hours left me with less than 18 other hours to cook, eat, clean the house, do dishes, do laundry, attempt to stay in touch with friends/family and work my last few shifts at Best Buy. No time for blogging, I barley made time to make an end of the month trip to Yellowstone (I had no choice, I had to make a trip to keep my 5 year run going).

If you forgive me, keep reading :)

Ask Dave, September 3rd
I get tons of questions each week, I respond as quickly as possible, and I might just answer them here too. If you have questions you can email me at Learn@DaveShumway.com.

Question:
From... Colleen
I will be visiting Yellowstone in September and have been addicted to your photo galleries. Beside the tourist areas in Yellowstone, are there any areas that you love to photograph at? Any advice you can give a novice photographer?

Answer:
September is a great time in YNP, but much will depend on weather.  Some years early September is cool, and the shooting is spectacular all around the park.  Other years it is hot into September/October and then the shooting can be much like summer, best at sunrise and sunset, then very slow all day.

My advice would be:
  • To spend time at higher elevations if you are looking to see and photograph bears;
  • To head to the Tetons mid September - early October if you seek moose;
  • To spend time around Canyon and Madison if elk are the object of your desire;
  • To search for great grey owls around Canyon;
  • To spend time around Canon/Hayden and Lamar if wolves are what you seek.
As far as landscapes the temperature will greatly impact the changing of the leaves, so it is always a guess as to where the colors will be best at any give time.  I tend to shoot early change in the Tetons, then focus on the colors of the Beartooth Pass and finish fall shooting whatever color I can find.  I know many folks who put all there eggs in the big change at Ox-Bow Bend, but normally they miss it (the big change happens inside of 24 hours most years).  I keep an eye on the Beartooth Pass because it is a short drive for me, if I lived in Jackson I would watch Ox-Bow Bend, and that is about the only way to be present at the right time (other than being super lucky, which I am not).

Use Av (aperture priority) mode if you can, make sure that you are checking your screen/histogram, bring all the telephoto power you can, download and inspect your photographs each night/day and enjoy your time out taking pictures in paradise.

I'll be making a trip in a few days, and will try to post to my blog/site/etc quickly after I return, but another great way to keep track of what is happening is to follow me on Twitter/Facebook/Google+, as I post my day by day while on trips (and share some updates that I receive from friends too).

The general nature photography tips still hold true:
  • You can't photograph it if you don't see it (so get up early and stay out late);
  • Bad weather makes for good light;
  • Change in weather stirs animals behaviors;
  • If you don't have a camera with and set you cannot capture an image.
Happy shooting

July 23, 2011

Ask Dave, July 23rd - Autofocus & TCs

I think this gets me all caught up on my weekly Ask Dave blog posts. Work has been extremely busy (we are launching a new website), so that is my excuse, I'll try to avoid falling behind again.

Ask Dave, July 23rd
I get tons of questions each week, I respond as quickly as possible, and I might just answer them here too. If you have questions you can email me at Learn@DaveShumway.com.

Question:
From... Debbie
So I hear these new TCs are great, but can I use them on my 100-400/5.6L IS?

Answer:
The new TCs are great, I assume you read my blog post about them a while ago.

Unfortunately they still don't work (AF) with an f/5.6 lens and a non 1 series camera. The 1.4TC III still slows your lens by one stop, and the 2.0TC III still slows your lens by two stops. What that means is if you have an f/2.8 lens and you place a 2.0TC III on it, the lens becomes an f/5.6 and a 7D can still autofocus that. Take a f/4.0 lens and place the same 2.0TC III on it it is then a f/8.0 lens and a 7D can not autofocus that, but a 1D IV can. Even as amazing as the 1D IV is, even it cannot autofocus a lens like the 100-400 with a 2.0TC III.

You can use some tricks to get a non 1 series camera to autofocus with a lens and TC combination that is f/8.0. By placing tape on the pins that communicate with the camera you can trick it to thinking there is no TC and it will still attempt to autofocus the combination (it is really slow). Unfortunately I have never seen anyone use a 2.0TC with the 100-400 and have any Canon camera autofocus the combination.

Remember that you can always manually focus your lens regardless of the lenses maximum aperture; but the darker the lens that harder it will be to see and manually focus your lens accurately.

p.s. from my experience all Canon cameras will attempt to autofocus any lens and TC combination (even at f/11) in liveView mode. It is slow and not really accurate, but it works (and usable for video).

Ask Dave, July 23rd - Photography Websites

Ask Dave, July 23rd
I get tons of questions each week, I respond as quickly as possible, and I might just answer them here too. If you have questions you can email me at Learn@DaveShumway.com.

Question:
From... Rob
I want to make a photo website; but the options confuse me. Do you have any suggestions?

Answer:
Typically I suggest that folks pay someone like SmugMug/LiveBooks/PhotoShelter to host their site and to help provide the technical end of the site. This takes most of the technical aspects out of making a photo site. If you go this route all you will need to do on the side is to find a domain registrar and choose the perfect domain name for you.

I'll address the three companies I have experience with and really the three best options available for photographers today.

I think that LiveBooks offers the best (most SEO friendly) portfolio site available (I love mine, and they do a great job).

SmugMug is the most affordable, and easiest to use option; but they have their limits, and they don't do a good job of handling stock image sales. (Their SEO is okay). They host unlimited images/videos for a very fair rate, and that is why I use them to host all of my trip images. Get their "Pro" account. (http://FragilePlaces.com)

I think the best all in one solution is PhotoShelter, and I am working with them to build my new stock sales site. The problem is that they are expensive, as you are forced to pay (big bucks) for data storage. They have solid SEO; but their "portfolio" / "blogs" are only okay compared to LiveBooks.

Whenever I finish my new stock site I will be using each of those companies for what they do best; but I don't really suggest that for most folks. (Choose the one that does what you really need/want)

If you don't plan to have a ton of images and want to print/ship yourself I think LiveBooks is your best bet.
If you want lots of images at a great rate, and are happy with the long list of services that SmugMug offers I think they are a great option.
If money is no object and you want lots of images with solid SEO and lots of printing options; but you don't mind if you sacrifice a bit on your portfolio then PhotoShelter is the way to go.

If you go the SmugMug route use this link to save both of us a bit ($5 I think):
https://secure.smugmug.com/signup.mg?Coupon=r9qtUffwT7wUY

I really like the look of what PhotoShelter is doing for a one stop solution; but they cost more if you have lots of images:
http://www.photoshelter.com/

LiveBooks sites are beautiful and have SEO dialed to perfection:
http://www.livebooks.com/
And I really like their mobile sites.

SEO = Search Engine Optimization, and it is a big deal.

July 4, 2011

Ask Dave, July 4th - Fireworks


Ask Dave, July 4th
I get tons of questions each week, I respond as quickly as possible, and I might just answer them here too. If you have questions you can email me at Learn@DaveShumway.com.

Question:
From... Dan
How should I photograph tonights fireworks?

Answer:
Well the best way to do it is by having your camera with you and remembering to use it. (The best camera is the one you have with you :)

I would go into a long list of tips/tricks; but countless others have already done it, so I'll give you some links, and a tip or two:
They all basically say the same thing; but I'll reiterate:
  • Use a tripod;
  • Get your exposure right (remember dark sky looks great as black);
  • I use a cable release;
  • Remember you are letting the motion of the light paint your picture;
  • Plan you shot ahead of time;
  • Have fun; but remember to take and use your camera.
Happy shooting, and God bless America

p.s. I have not photographed fireworks sense I took the shot on this post, back in 2006. I have been on photo trips to Glacier/Waterton/Colorado each year over the holiday weekend; but nature can give some nice firework displays too.

p.s.s. Remember that without all of the brave Americans that have served in the armed forces, each day would not be filled with freedom.

June 29, 2011

Ask Dave, June 29th - Two lenses

Ask Dave, June 29th (part 2)
I get tons of questions each week, I respond as quickly as possible, and I might just answer them here too. If you have questions you can email me at Learn@DaveShumway.com.

Question:
From... Countless friends/students/strangers/customers
If you could only have one, non professional, camera and two lenses what would you have?

Answer:
Are you saying you are going to take away the lenses that I have?

I will assume that I can also not have any one lens over say $2,000 and that I must stick with the brand of the camera I selected. In part 1 I selected the Nikon D700, so I need to look at Nikon lenses... Well that only leaves me with 7 Nikon lenses that have VR, are under $2,000, and will fit onto the D700's FX (full frame sensor). I like the idea of versatility and have always heard good things about the 24-120/4.0 VR, so that is my first choice. Second is hard because the 80-400 is junk, the 300/4.0 needs VR, they don't sell a 70-200/4.0, and they don't really have much else. The 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II is just over the limit (and I was well under the limit with the 24-120, so can we let it slide?). I would then commence "saving" for some TCs.

In Canon it would be the 17-40/4.0L and the 70-200/4.0L IS (odd loose the IS and those were my first two "L" lenses).

If I could have only one Canon lens to do everything I would get the 28-300L IS, and in Nikon I think I would stick with the 24-120VR because I have not heard good things about the Nikon 28-300VR; but maybe it would be okay.

I really wish I could put Canon glass on that D700 in this hypothetical situation :)

Ask Dave, June 29th - One camera

Ask Dave, June 29th (part 1)
I get tons of questions each week, I respond as quickly as possible, and I might just answer them here too. If you have questions you can email me at Learn@DaveShumway.com.

Sorry for the delay... I honestly thought this had posted while I was on my trip to the American Prairie Reserve; but it had not :(

Question:
From... Countless friends/students/strangers/customers
If you could only have one, non professional, camera and two lenses what would you have?

Answer:
Are you saying you are going to take away the cameras that I have? :)

Seriously that is a very difficult question... If I could only have one, non professional, camera (I'll assume that means no Canon 1 series or Nikon D3 series) what would I have? I have long told folks that it would be the Nikon D700 (shocker I know). Here is my reasoning:
  • Well built (great sealing)
  • Full frame
  • Fast frame rate (I would need the MB-D10 Multi-power Battery Pack to get 8fps)
  • Fast focus
  • Great low light shooting
  • Just enough resolution (for most applications)
I assume that if I only get one camera, I am no longer a working professional; but I also assume that I still want to be able to shoot a bit of everything. Something like the Canon 7D (a camera that I love) would be faster, have more pixels on my subject, has good focus, and is relatively well built; but it cannot handle high ISO shooting like a full frame camera. The Canon 5D II (a camera that I love too) has amazing resolution, great low light shooting; but it has a crippling slow frame rate, relatively poor autofocus, and is not as well build (think weather sealing).
To work professionally with only one camera I think you really need a Canon 1D IV or a Nikon D3s, alternatively you could just have a Canon 7D and 5D II (you cover all of your bases that way).
Am I thinking of switching to Nikon... NO!
I have tons of respect for the Nikon D700, even if the camera is old and in need of a refresh, it is still a great jack of all trades.
Do you want to know the lenses I would choose? Tune in for part two then.

Thanks

June 17, 2011

Ask Dave, June 17th - Canon 2.0TC III

Ask Dave, June 17th
I get tons of questions each week, I respond as quickly as possible, and I might just answer them here too. If you have questions you can email me at Learn@DaveShumway.com.

Question:
From... Brad and plenty of other folks
Do you ever really use your Canon 2.0TC III and is it any good?

Answer:
I get to be lazy this week, as I have already posted a blog post about this very subject:
http://blog.shumwayphotography.com/2011/01/70-20028l-is-ii-20-tc-iii.html

If you have more questions after the post... send them my way.

Thanks

June 11, 2011

Ask Dave, June 11th - Raw Conversion

Ask Dave, June 11th
I get tons of questions each week, I respond as quickly as possible, and I might just answer them here too. If you have questions you can email me at Learn@DaveShumway.com.

Question:
From... Justin and Todd
How do you convert your RAW images?
What do you use to be sure your camera/monitor/printer all look the same?
What are your RAW conversion settings?

Answer:
Well first off I use Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3, on Apple computers, with color calibrated monitors.
Now to what you want... my settings.
The easiest way is for me to just publish a version that folks can download and use at will (if you like it, remember where you got it). The file is .zip, so you will need to uncompress it and then import the file, "toShare.lrtemplate," into Lightroom. I did not include "White Balance" or "Calibration;" because they vary greatly depending on camera/ISO/the actual scene/etc.

Often I need to warm an image from what the camera gives me, and I also choose the appropriate calibration (weather that is eyeballing it or using a ColorChecker Passport).

Almost every image gets a few tweak from those basic settings, and at this point I can almost edit by numbers when I first look at a RAW image, and even in the field as I am shooting the shot. I have sharpening and noise reduction presets for different cameras/subjects/ISOs; but the included settings are good (ish) for something like a 7D @ISO400 for wildlife.

Occasionally I will adjust individual color saturation and luminance to mimic certain films; but that is not the "norm."

I have posted it on my LiveBooks Site FTP:
Please click on the link below to have it download through a web browser window.
(If clicking on it doesn't launch a browser window, then you must select the URL, copy and paste it into a web browser address bar, and tap the Enter or Return key on your keyboard. The file should then begin to load.)
http://www.daveshumway.com/toShare_lrtemplate.zip

Enjoy

June 3, 2011

Ask Dave, June 3rd - What to Buy

Ask Dave, June 3rd
I get tons of questions each week, I respond as quickly as possible, and I might just answer them here too. If you have questions you can email me at Learn@DaveShumway.com.

Question:
From... A participant in one of my lectures for the Photographic Institute of the Yellowstone
When should I upgrade cameras and what should I buy first?

Answer:
AS SOON AS YOU CAN!
If you can afford an upgrade, and you can justify it... then you should do it. I am not a big fan of debt, especially credit card debt, so I normally suggest some saving first; but that is just my bias. If you are starting a photography business maybe you should try to get a business loan rather than putting the gear on your credit card, just a thought.
I cannot begin to tell you how many amazing things I photographed with film, before digital, or with shorter/darker lenses before the 300/2.8L IS and 500/4.0L IS became part of my arsenal. At the time I wished I had better equipment, and now I look at those images and wish that I had sprung for better gear sooner.

That said gear does not make the photographer, nor will simply owning/using better gear make you better. I have countless friends who have rented gear for their "big trip" and come home with images worse than what they could/would have created with the "normal" gear. If you don't know how to use it, it will not help you create better images, so you need to have gear that matches your ability.
If you just want better "stuff" to get better images, buy a nice tripod and use it always (you will spend $500-1500+).

As for what you should buy first... If you have bought into a brand like Canon or Nikon then you have started off in a brand that will really let you grow. If you have a Sony/Pentax/Olympus/etc. you might want to think about switching to Canon/Nikon. Inside of Canon and Nikon any camera body, that will focus the lens options you would consider, is a great place to start. Camera bodies depreciate rapidly, while lenses (lately) have proven to appreciate, so I tell folks to "invest" in glass. The other way to think about it is that your vision can be perfect (20/20); but if you are looking through dark fuzzy glasses things will never look quite right :)

Specifically speaking cameras and lenses that I have high regard for are:
  • Canon 7D (for sports and wildlife)
  • Canon 5DII (for portraits and landscapes)
  • Nikon D7000 (for sports and wildlife)
  • Nikon D700 (for portraits and landscapes)
  • The Nikon 3100/5100 are also capable cameras; but they cannot focus some of the Nikor lenses (a downfall as I see it).
  • The Canon Rebel line is full of great options; but I like cameras that have some weather resistance and a metal body (they do focus all of the Canon lenses).
  • The Canon 1DsIII and 1DIV are great cameras; but not starter cameras, and may be a bit inflated in price (same with the Nikon D3s and D3x).
In lenses there is lots of differentiation based on what you want to shoot, and how much you want to spend; but some popular focal lengths are:
  • The 70-200 is most everyones work horse lens and if you spring for a f/2.8 version you can use 1.4TCs and 2.0TCs to make it more telephoto, as well as extension tubes to make it a macro (my 70-200/2.8L IS II is my workhorse, and the 70-200/4.0L was my first "L" lens, and I still use it to this day)
  • The 24-70 is the second most common lens range and for portrait/landscape folks it might even be higher on the list. (I suggest making it a f/2.8 version for sports/events)
  • A wide angle like the Nikor 14-24 or Canon 16-35/17-40 are great to have to offer a wide perspective (this is a lens that for landscapes you don't need it to be super fast; but if you shoot events you do want a f/2.8 version)
  • Next folks look at super telephoto lenses, and the price can be super too. I am a firm believer in having a super telephoto that you can travel/hike with. I loved the 300/2.8 for its mix of speed/size/weight. I think the 500/4.0 is the most popular for its reach and still manageable size/weight. With Canon shaving weight from their new super telephoto offering lenses like the 400/2.8 and 600/4.0 become more tempting (and I have the new 400/2.8 on order :)
  • After that it becomes time to look at specialty lenses. I love tilt/shift lenses while others love fish eye or macro lenses... to each their own.
Remember at the end of the day the gear you have will not make you a better photographer, nor will professional gear make you a professional, and you can't create images sitting behind your computer while you look at gear online ;)

May 29, 2011

Ask Dave, May 29th - Stay in Yellowstone

Ask Dave, May 29th
I get tons of questions each week, I respond as quickly as possible, and I might just answer them here too. If you have questions you can email me at Learn@DaveShumway.com.

Question:
From... Yellowstone (A question I get asked multiple times a day, every day that I am in the park)
Where do you sleep when you are in the park?

Answer:
I stay in many different places.
My preference is to camp, as I am then free to change locations in the park without a major inconvenience. I don't mind camping in cold weather, so even winter camping is not out of the question. The only thing I don't like about camping is eventually you want/need a shower and sometimes it is nice to have power and TV on those long winter nights.
I will stay in hotels occasionally, typically when the nights are very long and cold, and the hotel rates are cheep. My hotel of choice is the Super 8 in Gardiner as they have fair (ish) rates, a breakfast that is early enough for photographers, and faster internet.
I also have a number of friends who live in Gardiner, and will sporadically stay with them, when they offer.
Lastly I will sleep in my car if I can't get a campsite or other option, typically I reserve car sleeping for when I need a little middle of the day siesta. (I do not overnight in my car inside the park, I head outside the park to designated areas for such things)

May 22, 2011

Ask Dave, May 22nd - Focus Calibration

Ask Dave, May 22nd
I get tons of questions each week, I respond as quickly as possible, and I might just answer them here too. If you have questions you can email me at Learn@DaveShumway.com.

Question:
From... Karl
Are you use one of the products available through B&H (as well as other sources), or a different method to micro adjust your gear?

Answer:
I was going to try and make a video of me doing a micro-focus adjust; but I have been a little short on time over the last month.  When the heat of summer gets here maybe I'll find the time to make a video; but this will have to do for now.

Originally I had all of my gear physically calibrated by Canon Professional Services and they did a great job; but they don't do that anymore. In the past I used a homemade solution to test, and later to micro adjust my own gear.  Now I  have and use the Lens Align Mark II.  I am not 100% sure that it is worth the $79.95; but it is better than my old, cheap, solution.  

It is very important that you know how your gear performs and that you use every means available to dial things as near to perfection as possible. Find a way to correct front/back focusing problems, these days with most Canon and Nikon cameras offering micro-adjustment or AF fine tuning there is no excuse not to.

It is also a good way to see the sharpness of a lens. I was checking the micro adjust on my 5DII with my 500/4.0L IS a week ago and a friend was using a rental 500/4.5L, so we put that lens through the test too, and boy was it far off and soft. We dialed the lens in for his camera; but there was noting we could do about the softness :(

May 15, 2011

Ask Dave, May 6th - Backcountry Photography

Ask Dave, May 15th
'Ask Dave' week Thirteen… I get tons of questions each week, I respond as quickly as possible, and this is week number thirteen of answering them here too. If you have questions you can email me at Learn@DaveShumway.com.

Question:
From... Sorry I can't remember your name.
How many of your "real good" images from Yellowstone come from "backcountry" spots.

Answer:
My answer was not a good one; but here is what I had to say:
"I would guess that a normal trip has 10-20 real 'select' or 'keeper' images, lots of other fine images that I can use for stock; but 10-20 'real keepers.' Of those 10-20 less than one is typically from a backcountry camping trip. When I am really in the backcountry I am there for the experience, less emphasis is on photography for those trips; but I still always bring a camera. That said many consider 'backcountry' to be anytime that one leaves the roads or developed areas by more than 100-250 yards and I would say that 5-10 of the 10-20 'keeper' images come from more than 100 yards from the roads (in some months it is more like 15 of 20)."

I felt bad about my answer; but luckily for me I had a chance to ask a real expert on Yellowstone/Photography/Backcountry (Tom Murphy) the same question. I presented for the Photographic Institute of the Yellowstone on Saturday and Tom Murphy was the keynote speaker, so I took the chance to ask him the same question, and his answer was very similar to mine. "Well... my overnight trips really are more about getting from place to place and I don't get to spend the time needed to shoot really good images (he gave some examples); but most of my images come from more than 100 yards from the roads. I would say 75-90% of the images in those books (referring to his YNP books) were made away from the road; but not from overnight trips." (That is my best summary of his response, I did not record it)

May 6, 2011

Ask Dave, May 6th - PIY EXPO

Ask Dave, May 6th
'Ask Dave' week twelve… I get tons of questions each week, I respond as quickly as possible, and this is week number twelve of answering them here too. If you have questions you can email me at Learn@DaveShumway.com.

Question:
From Mike... (A plug for PIY)
What should I do next weekend? (May 13th - 15th, 2011)

Answer:
Everyone should head to Billings for the annual EXPO hosted by the Photographic Institute of the Yellowstone.
All of the details are on their site.

I'll be in attendance Saturday, not only because I am leading a pair of the breakouts; but also because you can't miss a chance to listen to Tom Murphy speak about his 30 year career.

p.s. this year's EXPO will be held on the Rocky Mountain College Campus, I wonder how that happened ;)

p.s.s. before and after the EXPO folks should spend all the time they can in Yellowstone National Park (I know I will)

April 27, 2011

Ask Dave, April 27th - Packing for a Lek

Ask Dave, April 27th
'Ask Dave' week eleven… I get tons of questions each week, I respond as quickly as possible, and this is week number eleven of answering them here too. If you have questions you can email me at Learn@DaveShumway.com.

Question:
From Erik...
How do you pack (what do you take along) for a normal day of shooting?

Answer:
I don't know if you would call star trails, time lapses, and a Sage-Grouse Lek "normal;" but I made a little video before heading out for a night and morning shoot on some remote BLM land.

HERE IS THE VIDEO

Enjoy

I also had three tripods along for the ride:
  • Gitzo 3540XLS with an Induro GHB2 full gimbal head (with custom long lens support). This was used for the Canon 7D and 500/4.0L IS
  • Induro CT214 with an Acratech GP ball head. This was used for the Canon 5DII and 17-40/4.0L for time lapse/star trails and then with the 70-200/2.8L IS while photographing from my blind at the Lek.
  • Induro A413 with an Arca-Swiss Z1sp ball head. This was used for the Canon 20D and 28-135IS for time lapse/star trails.

April 21, 2011

Ask Dave, April 21st - Churchill 2011

Ask Dave, April 21st
'Ask Dave' week ten… I get tons of questions each week, I respond as quickly as possible, and this is week number ten of answering them here too. If you have questions you can email me at Learn@DaveShumway.com.

Question:
From Pete...
Can I go with you to Churchill in the fall?

Answer:
YES you can...

I am going to Churchill with Dr. Jim Halfpenny, Professor Kayhan Ostovar, and some college students in October of 2011 to photograph Polar Bears, Snowy Owls, Arctic Fox, and more. *

I am not leading the trip, I am not being paid to go, I am actually paying to attend and paying to earn college credit on the trip (you never know when having a few extra Environmental Science credits will come in handy). The cool thing is that you can all go too.

There are thirteen spots total and a handful left open for auditors.

All of the details are on the RMC site:
http://rocky.edu/academics/programs/environmental/Churchill.shtml

Here are some of the key details:
October 12th - 18th, 2011
We will spend 4 days on the tundra, in vans, not the big, crowded, buggies.
We live at the research center, studying and photographing bears each day with lectures each evening.
Cost for RMC students is $2980
Cost for auditors is $3400 (this includes a private room en-route to Winnipeg)**
Initial deposit of $500 due April 30th. (I know that is coming soon)
Final payment due August 1st.
Travel insurance is required and can be purchased from Rocky for $13.50 (this is not trip cancellation insurance).

* (Hopefully all of them each day; but RMC and Dr. Jim Halfpenny would like to stress that polar bears are never a guarantee :)
** Auditors must also pay the standard course audit fee of $105, or $62 if you are over 60 years old.

As the RMC site says:
"RMC staff photographer and instructor of photography, Dave Shumway, will be joining the trip as a member of the class, so there will be chances for some photography instruction (when the teacher in him outshines the photographer in him)."

I really like the Naturescapes.net article about Churchill trips.

April 13, 2011

Ask Dave, April 13th - Lightroom Key Commands

Ask Dave, April 13th
'Ask Dave' week nine… I get tons of questions each week, I respond as quickly as possible, and this is week number nine of answering them here too. If you have questions you can email me at Learn@DaveShumway.com.

Question:
From John...
What are the Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 3 key commands, and what ones do you actually use?

Answer:
Every Lightroom 3 key command is availible online here.

What ones do I use... not as many as I should.
Remember the commands I list here are for Mac OS, if you use a Windows box (you should buy a Mac), or know that; "Command" is "Control" and "Option" is "Alt."
Here they are, in no particular order:

  • Convert to grayscale - "V"

  • Edit in Photoshop - "Command + E

  • Paste settings from previous photo - "Command + Option + V"

  • Reset a slider - "Double-click slider name"

  • Toggle between Loupe and 1:1 Zoom preview - "Spacebar or Z"

  • Undo - "Command + Z"

  • Redo - "Command + Shift + Z"

  • Convert to grayscale - "V"

  • Increase/decrease brush size - "[ / ]"

  • Increase/decrease brush feathering - "Shift + ] / Shift + ["

  • Remove selected photo(s) from catalog - "Option + Delete"

  • Go to next/previous photo in the Filmstrip - "Right Arrow/Left Arrow"

  • Set star rating - "1 - 5" (Add "Shift" to go to next photo)

  • Remove star rating - "0" (Add "Shift" to go to next photo)

  • Assign a red label - "6" (Add "Shift" to go to next photo)

  • Assign a yellow label - "7" (Add "Shift" to go to next photo)

  • Assign a green label - "8" (Add "Shift" to go to next photo)

  • Assign a blue label - "9" (Add "Shift" to go to next photo)

  • Add keywords - "Command + K"

  • Edit keywords - "Command + Shift + K"

  • Check spelling - "Command + ;"

I am sure I use more than I put in this list; but these are the ones I can think of, and use on a regular basis...

Oh I love to hold "Option" while adjusting my sharpening (do it and you will know why).

This post has caused me to order a keyboard cover with all of the LR3 keyboard shortcuts/commands on it. (Thanks B&H)

April 3, 2011

Ask Dave, April 3rd - Star Trails

Ask Dave, April 3rd
'Ask Dave' week eight… I get tons of questions each week, I respond as quickly as possible, and this is week number eight of answering them here too. If you have questions you can email me at Learn@DaveShumway.com.

Question:
From too many folks to name...
How do you photograph star trails?

SORRY IN ADVANCE FOR ALL OF THE 'VOICE' CHANGES.

Answer:
How to photograph star trails...
First you need a clear night in a place where you can see stars; but I assume you knew that ;)

Typically I suggest using lunar charts to shoot around a new moon, and or when the moon will be underfoot at night (set before you start and rise after you finish). It is dark enough about one to two hours after sunset and before sunrise; but there is often lots of air traffic until 11pm, so if you are near flight routes you might want to wait until after 11pm. (most agree that 1:00a-4:30a has virtually no air traffic)

Two ways to think about composing the star trails in your shot are:
  • To place Polaris (the North star) in your frame, where all of the other stars with appear to circle around it (assuming you are in the northern hemisphere). I normally place Polaris in my shot when shooting wide angle shots.
  • To keep Polaris (the North star) out of your frame, this will create arcs, and not complete circles. Any composition facing north will yield arcs in the northern hemisphere. Typically I do not shoot south in the northern hemisphere because the "arcs" become more like straight lines and are not very nice. When shooting more telephoto shots I avoid placing Polaris in the frame, and use the "arcs" in my composition. (When I say; "North"/"South" I mean north/south of a theoretical line between East and West.)
How to you find Polaris? Easy, first you need an iPhone or other smart phone with a star finder app, then you look it up :) (Star Walk rocks) Or you can do it the old fashioned way; find the Big Dipper (Ursa Major) follow in a line up from the outside edge of the pan to the first big star (that is it). When you are scouting use your compass and assume Polaris is North :) Remember that the further North you are, the higher in the sky Polaris will be.

Some other star notes:
  • Stars move about 15° each hour, so if you can expose for 6 hours you would have stars going 1/4 of the way around Polaris (6 hours is hard to do in summer months, and batteries die too quickly in winter months to get a 6 hour exposure and a 6 hour noise reduction exposure).
  • The higher your elevation the more stars you are likely to see.
  • The best star viewing is 25-150 miles away from towns/cites (the more people the further you should be).
  • The weather needs to allow views of the stars for the entire expose, if clouds break your view you will have breaks in the trails, also clouds tend to be collectors of light pollution. (if clouds break up your exposure it could look like this)
  • Avoid moon light, as it will cut your maximum exposure time dramatically. A 1/4 moon opposite your field of view will limit you to about a 30min exposure before the land looks like it is sunlit.
Remember:
  • You will be forced to use "B" aka. "Bulb" mode.
  • RAW is the only way to go.
  • The further away from town (light pollution) the better the star trails will look. (typically)
  • Looking away from town (light pollution) is normally a good idea.
  • Remove camera straps and anything else that will blow in the wind.
  • Turn off your cameras/lens' image stabilization.
  • Normally it is a great idea to turn on your cameras long exposure noise reduction.
  • Shooting lenses wide open can show more vignetting and other aberrations.
  • It is easier to start experimenting with wider angle lenses 17-35mm.
An issue in photographing star trails is dealing with focus in the dark. NO, you should not just turn your camera to infinity, that is a very common thought; but not a correct one (most of the time). What you really want to do is focus your lens at its hyperfocal point for the aperture value you are going to be shooting at. Wide angles are much easier, for example, my 17mm on a full frame camera at f/4.0 focused at 8 feet will, for a normal print size, makes everything from 4 feet through infinity appear to be in focus. Alternatively at 300mm at f/22 requires focus at 450 feet to have everything from 225 feet through infinity appear to be in focus, for a normal print. (You can always focus further away than the lenses hyperfocal point and everything from half of that distance through infinity will appear in focus, for a normal print). I normally set up the camera before the sun sets, so I can set everything with plenty of daylight to aid in focusing.

Things you need/should have:
  • A tripod and remote shutter release are required.
    • The remote must be lockable or an Intervalometer
    • Intervalometer remotes can be pre programed allowing you to sleep in peace without worry about sleeping through the alarm to tell you to release your locking remote. (a computer or similar device can also work as an Intervalometer).
  • A bubble level will make your life much easier.
  • Live view on your camera will help you get the focus set properly.
  • Mirror lockup is not a must. (with exposures this long it really does not matter)
  • A headlamp, hat, gloves, warm boots/coat/pants, snacks, basically all the things you need to spend time outside in the "cold" night.
  • I am assuming you have a camera and lens that you can control, and know how to use. If you do not know how to use your camera in the warm, well light, indoors, then you will not be able to use it in the cold, dark, outdoors.
Now for getting the exposure correct…
  • I typically do some quick head math; but it is not hard math, so don't worry:
    • 4hr - 2hr - 1hr - 30min - 15min - 8min - 4min - 2min - .1min - 30sec
    • ISO50 - ISO100 - ISO200 - ISO400 - ISO800 - ISO1600 - ISO3200 - ISO6400 - ISO12,800 - ISO25,600
    • Those are all one stop apart.
  • If I do a 30sec exposure at ISO25,600 it will be just about the same as a 4hr exposure at ISO50. Do you see what I did?
  • Think about everything in stops, so you can then play around to find the exposure you need without having to do crazy long exposures, as tests.
  • This is an example of my high ISO test to get a proper exposure, and the two hour 'real' exposure is the shot at the top of this post.
  • Your aperture should be set based on the needed depth of field (or hyperfocal) settings and how many stars you want to see, if you can't test the full spread you need with ISO you can also move the lens in full stop increments.
  • Remember a 4 hour exposure to an 8 hour exposure is only one stop, so if you miss by an hour or two you might only miss by a half stop (or so)… not the end of the world with digital files.
  • Honestly if you are going to miss, you should miss to the side of overexposure, one full stop is easy to save in post; but one stop under will not work as well for most situations/compositions.
  • I really like two to three hour exposures (with wide angles); both because of how my camera handles it, and the resulting 30-45° arch that the circling stars make around Polaris. When I shoot more telephoto images (not at Polaris) I really like the one hour realm.
  • I like to use flashlights to paint light in on my foreground subjects; but using foreground elements as simple silhouettes can be very cool too.
  • Once you have this mastered try to shoot a foreground subject that is light by strobes, and then turn your focus to the stars and let the 1+ hour exposure continue to bring in your star trails. Note… It helps to cover your lens (blacked out) when changing your focus (trust me).
I am sure that I missed something, so as you have questions, just ask.

I believe in shooting the star trails in a single exposure; but you can also do lots of individual exposures and put them together with Achim Schaller's freeware StarTrails program, or Chris Schur's Star Trail Action inside of Photoshop to make a single image that is the equivalent of a single long exposure. One big plus is that you can avoid the issues that you run into with long exposure noise reduction; but some agencies, competitions, magazines, and art buyers do not accept multiple exposure composites, so the choice is yours. Most folks keep their short exposures under 10min; but well over the point that the stars actually blur/move.

March 30, 2011

Ask Dave, March 30th

'Ask Dave' week seven... I get tons of questions each week, and I respond as quickly as possible, and this is week number seven of answering them here too. If you have questions you can email me at Learn@DaveShumway.com.

Question:
From Nannie...
How do I photograph the Northern Lights?

Answer:
Well first you need a relatively clear night in a place where you can see the Northern Lights; but I assume you knew that :) With digital cameras allowing quality captures at ISO400-800, and beyond, shooting Northern Light displays are easier now than ever before. The common problem with shooting the Northern Lights is streaking stars in the shot, and the higher ISO availability of digital comes to the rescue. To avoid streaking stars the general rule is take 600 and divide by your lenses focal length (camera crop taken into account). Some used to say that 800-1000 would work; but I have had that fail me, and 600 never has. Let us look at a few examples. You are in northern Montana using a Canon 7D and a 70-200/2.8L IS II you are shooting at 200mm (you need to zoom in as the Northern Lights are low in the sky). Your 200mm lens is acting like a 320mm lens with the cameras 1.6FOVC, so 600/320=1.9 seconds not much time to make a night exposure, so your lens will likely need to be wide open and your ISO up. Next situation you are in Alaska and the Northern Lights fill the sky, so you take out your 5DII and 17-40/4.0L and are shooting at 24mm. 600/24=25 seconds and that affords you the luxury of a lower ISO and a smaller aperture opening (bigger Av # = smaller opening = more Depth of field).

Another issue in photographing the Northern Lights is dealing with focus in the dark. NO, you should not just turn your camera to infinity, that is a very common thought; but not a correct one (most of the time). What you really want to do is focus your lens at its hyperfocal point for the aperture value you are going to be shooting at. Wide angles are much easier, for example, my 17mm on a full frame camera at f/4.0 focused at 8 feet will, for a normal print size, make everything from 4 feet through infinity appear to be in focus. Alternatively at 300mm and f/22 I would need to focus at 450 feet to have everything from 225 feet through infinity appear to be in focus, for a normal print. (You can always focus further away than the lenses hyperfocal setting and everything from half of that distance through infinity will appear in focus, for a normal print).

Remember…
  • Late night sky is normally supposed to be black, not grey as your camera will try to make it.
  • RAW is the only way to go.
  • The further away from town (light pollution) the better the Northern Lights will look.
  • Looking away from town towards the Northern Lights is normally a good idea.

Things you need/should have…
  • A tripod is almost a must.
  • A Remote Shutter Release. (I am a fan of Intervalometer remotes)
  • A bubble level will make your life much easier.
  • Live view on your camera will help you get the focus and exposure set properly.
  • If you want solid images mirror lockup or live view both paired with a cable release is a must.
  • A headlamp, hat, gloves, warm boots/coat/pants, snacks, basically all the things you need to stand outside in the cold.
  • I am assuming you have a camera and lens that you can control, and know how to use. If you do not know how to use your camera in the warm, well light, indoors, then you will not be able to use it in the cold, dark, outdoors.
Quality predictions can be found for the state of Alaska here.

If you have more questions just ask. Oh and one confession I need to make… I have not photographed the Northern Lights digitally; but I still know plenty about it from the days gone by, and the advice here can all be corroborated across the internet.

Much of this is a great base for next weeks 'Ask Dave' which is all about shoot star trails.